Overview

FIBERPROCESSER

Row

Publications in DiVA 2020
(fractional counts)

1.5

WoS coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

84.8 %

Scopus coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

100 %

Row

Notes more…

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Overall Web of Science coverage for peer reviewed publications in this unit is good, 84.8%.

Note that the coverage numbers for Web of Science and Scopus apply to publications in the KTH bibliometric database Bibmet. If a WoS-id or Scoupus-id from DiVA can not be matched in Bibmet, it does not count as covered.

Row

Background

The bibliometric indicators referred are based on publications registered in DiVA. Only publications from currently employed researchers at KTH are included. The rolling nature of this report means that it provides more of a current overview and less of a historic stable trend, since it excludes publications written by researchers that are no longer affiliated to KTH, but have been at some point in time.

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Row

Researchers at the unit

Publication data is available only after login.

Publications in DiVA

FIBERPROCESSER

Row

Fractional count

Publication volume, fractionalized

Publication volume, fractionalized

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 1.4 1.2 1.1 2.6 2.5 1.4 1.5 11.9 98.6% 1
Article, other NA 0.2 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.8 NA 2.8 100.0% 0
Conference paper, peer review 0.5 NA 0.2 0.6 0.5 NA NA 1.9 0.0% 1
Doctoral thesis NA NA 1.0 NA NA NA NA 1.0 0.0% 0
Licentiate thesis 1.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA 1.0 0.0% 0

Full count

Publication volume, full count

Publication volume, full count

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 7 5 6 9 13 7 8 55 98.2% 1
Article, other NA 1 3 3 3 4 NA 14 100.0% 0
Conference paper, peer review 2 NA 1 3 2 NA NA 8 0.0% 1
Doctoral thesis NA NA 1 NA NA NA NA 1 0.0% 0
Licentiate thesis 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 0.0% 0

Row

Publication volume

Publication volume

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Citation impact

FIBERPROCESSER

Row

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 1.3 11.1 8.8 0.0 0.0%
2015 1.0 6.6 6.6 0.0 0.0%
2016 1.1 3.0 2.8 0.0 0.0%
2017 2.6 9.9 3.8 0.2 9.6%
2018 2.5 26.6 10.5 0.0 0.0%
Total 8.5 57.2 6.7 0.2 2.9%

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Cf Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 3.3 1.55 0.4 13.3%
2015-2017 4.7 0.87 0.2 3.6%
2016-2018 6.2 1.02 0.5 7.8%
2017-2019 6.6 1.19 0.5 7.6%
Total 9.9 1.31 0.9 9.5%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article, Proceedings paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 5 (full counted) publications with moderate Web of Science coverage (at least 65.4%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 17 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 95.6%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Average field normalized citations (Cf)

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal impact

FIBERPROCESSER

Row

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Journal Cf Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 3.0 1.36 1.4 45.7%
2015-2017 4.3 1.45 2.1 47.4%
2016-2018 5.9 1.43 2.8 48.6%
2017-2019 6.6 1.57 3.8 57.0%
2018-2020 5.5 1.55 2.8 51.6%
Total 11.1 1.47 5.5 49.2%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 17 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 95.6%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Field normalized journal impact (JCf)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

FIBERPROCESSER

Row

Summary

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

Publication years Publications Swedish non-university co-publications Share Swedish non-university International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 16 3 18.8% 11 68.8%
2015-2017 19 3 15.8% 10 52.6%
2016-2018 28 7 25.0% 14 50.0%
2017-2019 29 6 20.7% 14 48.3%
2018-2020 28 6 21.4% 17 60.7%
Total 53 11 20.8% 31 58.5%

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 16 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 94.4%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and Swedish non-university co‑publication

Countries and organizations

Co‑publication countries

Co‑publication countries

Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
United States 17 16 1 0 0 3.5
Germany 10 8 2 0 0 2.0
China 4 4 0 0 0 0.8
Ukraine 5 5 0 0 0 0.7
France 4 4 0 0 0 0.6
Japan 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
Norway 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
Poland 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
Netherlands 2 2 0 0 0 0.2
Portugal 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Denmark 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Latvia 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Spain 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.1

Co‑publication organizations

Co‑publication countries

Organization Organization type Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
DESY Other Public Germany 9 7 2 0 0 1.8
Georgia Institute of Technology University United States 6 6 0 0 0 1.4
RISE - Research Institutes of Sweden Institute Sweden 7 6 1 0 0 1.1
Inventia AB Institute Sweden 5 4 1 0 0 0.9
Stony Brook University, The State University of New York University United States 4 4 0 0 0 0.8
Massachusetts Institute of Technology University United States 2 2 0 0 0 0.6
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Institute Ukraine 4 4 0 0 0 0.6
University of Minnesota University United States 3 3 0 0 0 0.5
Aix-Marseille University University France 3 3 0 0 0 0.4
University of Tokyo University Japan 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
Welcome to Wallenberg Wood Science Center (WWSC) Institute Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
Stanford University University United States 2 1 1 0 0 0.4
Innventia AB Institute Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Sun Yat-sen University University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Gothenburg University Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
Borregaard AS NA Norway 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
National Technical University of Ukraine Kiev Polytechnic Institute University Ukraine 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
Maria Curie-Sklodowska University University Poland 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
Brookhaven National Laboratory Institute United States 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
FEI Europe BV Company Netherlands 2 2 0 0 0 0.2
Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht Center for Materials and Coastal Research Institute Germany 2 1 1 0 0 0.2
Central South University University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Lyon University France 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Chuiko Institute of Surface Chemistry Institute Ukraine 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Kiev National University of Trade and Economics (KNUTE) University Ukraine 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Linköping University University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Coimbra University Portugal 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Cent South Univ NA China 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Dept Biomed Sci NA Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Latvian State Institute of Wood Chemistry Institute Latvia 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Institute United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Lund University University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Malmö University College University College Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Pasteur Institute Other France 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Ruhr University Bochum University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
South China University of Technology University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Spiber AB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Copenhagen University Denmark 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of the Basque country (UPV/EHU) University Spain 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
MoRe Research Örnsköldsvik AB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Polytechnic University of Turin University Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Technical University of Munich University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Kiel University University Germany 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University of Michigan University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.1

Open Access

FIBERPROCESSER

Row

Open Access publications, full counts

Open Access publications, full counts

Publication Year Publications Open Access publications OA gold OA hybrid OA green OA bronze Not OA Share OA
2014 7 2 1 1 0 0 5 28.6%
2015 5 2 0 0 1 1 3 40.0%
2016 6 1 0 0 1 0 5 16.7%
2017 9 2 0 1 0 1 7 22.2%
2018 13 7 2 4 1 0 6 53.8%
2019 7 4 0 3 1 0 3 57.1%
2020 8 6 2 4 0 0 2 75.0%
Total 55 24 5 13 4 2 31 43.6%

Row

Notes more…

The Open Access type of the publications was fetched from the Unpaywall REST API. The method to determine the OA type is presented here.

In summary, the different OA types can be described as follows:

  • Gold: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is fully OA.

  • Hybrid: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is not fully OA.

  • Green: The full text has been found in an institutional repository, such as DiVA.

  • Bronze: The full text has been found on a publisher website but no OA license could be identified.

N.B.: This table is based on peer-reviewed publications for which Unpaywall could determine the OA type (necessary condition: have a DOI number). Unpaywall’s method is empirical and does not strictly equate to copyright license. As a consequence, the OA status of a given publication may vary with time — for example turning from “Not OA” to “Green” when a full text is added to DiVA.

Row

Overview of Open Access publications - piechart

Stacked area chart for publications

Scopus

FIBERPROCESSER

Row

Citation Impact

Column

Citations, open window
Citations, open window
Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 1.9 46.5 24.1 0.7 34.6%
2015 1.0 13.9 13.9 0.0 0.0%
2016 1.3 8.8 6.6 0.2 18.7%
2017 3.3 21.8 6.7 0.6 19.8%
2018 3.1 41.3 13.5 0.5 17.4%
2019 1.4 12.1 8.4 0.2 13.8%
2020 1.5 4.6 3.0 0.1 8.2%
Total 13.5 149.0 11.0 2.4 17.9%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Conference Paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 5 (full counted) publications with good Scopus coverage (at least 100%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Average field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Publication years Publications Average FWCI Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 4.3 1.06 0.4 10.0%
2015-2017 5.6 0.69 0.1 2.2%
2016-2018 7.6 0.97 0.3 4.5%
2017-2019 7.6 1.12 0.3 4.5%
Total 11.8 1.10 0.8 6.5%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 21 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 100%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal Impact

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Publication years Publications Average SNIP Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 3.1 1.27 1.7 54.4%
2015-2017 4.3 1.27 1.8 40.7%
2016-2018 5.9 1.32 2.9 49.8%
2017-2019 6.6 1.39 3.7 55.8%
2018-2020 5.5 1.40 3.1 55.8%
Total 11.2 1.34 5.6 49.9%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 21 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 100%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Field normalized journal impact (SNIP)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
Publication years Publications Corporate co-publications Share corporate International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 20 3 15.0% 12 60.0%
2015-2017 23 1 4.3% 10 43.5%
2016-2018 34 1 2.9% 15 44.1%
2017-2019 34 0 0.0% 16 47.1%
2018-2020 30 0 0.0% 18 60.0%
Total 62 3 4.8% 34 54.8%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 20 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 100%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and corporate co‑publication

About

Row